Lots of folks don’t see the dire straights that Microsoft is in, Microsoft has neglected and they don’t comprehend why. Yet, their strategies are counterproductive, reactionary, and completely handcuffed by their past.

The computing marketplace is changing fast and it’s to Microsoft’s detriment. They’ve a monopoly lock on the conventional desktop computers and notebooks essentially the center of the marketplace. Having said that, they’re losing marketshare in the mid-market range, but quite slowly. Unfortunately for Microsoft, this market isn’t growing, it’s decreasing rather fast. Yet, in servers on the high end, both computing marketplaces that are growing, cellphones and tablet computers on the low end, Microsoft is not really competitive.

As you read the complete story here, and can see from the image above, cellular is growing with breathtaking rapidity, and Microsoft is in that space. Despite spending billions of dollars on marketing, billions more to efficiently purchase Nokia, and throwing all their monopolistic strategies that are significant at the space, it’s clear the business is at a loss for ideas in this space.

By leashing Windows desktop computer to the telephones that were unsuccessful, instead of building on the comparative powers of each, Microsoft weakened the standing of both and has just driven away prospective customers. Windows mobile marketshare can be counted on one hand missing several fingers in an industrial injury. Tablet computers are telephones as well as doing. Microsoft doesn’t comprehend why.

Server marketshare numbers are considerably tougher to come by, but web server share amounts simple to discover. Servers generally are considerably more difficult to pin down, primarily because the marketplace has changed drastically in the last few years. The greatest public source SemiAccurate can point to is that’s sales based, although IDC, while exact for what it symbolizes, is just a fraction of the overall server market, and counts just conventional sellers.

Two different sources gave nearly the exact same amounts when asked about it in September.

Servers are growing fast, all those mobile devices need something to feed them information, and the Internet isn’t becoming smaller. Microsoft isn’t in the cloud, and the conventional server space is being eaten by the cloud with awful rapidity.

Microsoft did something unfathomable to fight this tendency, they pushed their cellular UI on to servers. Nothing will, if this doesn’t graphically illustrate how badly Microsoft direction is out of touch with this kind of vital marketplace. It isn’t only a counterproductive move, it defies logic. Microsoft took a growing marketplace that share was bleeding in, and tied it to their new cellular UI that’s detested among command line centric server users. This not only further weakens their server potencies, it also directly endangers their core desktop computer marketplace too.

Throughout all this, one matter has been pricing that is sacrosanct at Microsoft, Windows and Office. List prices should not be reached, if a customer balks, there are many different carrots and sticks to be used to rock the price but the two chief columns of Microsoft gain, Office permits and Windows permits, don’t budge. Ever. Throw in ‘precious’ extras like training, support, setup, and several extras like Sharepoint or online services, but the heart is complete cost. Some prices are cut, if not NDA’d, you WOn’t ever formally learn about prices on the center products but they’re firmly hushed up.