Beckerman states that IP addresses are to show that Gonzales was involved with copyright infringement.

You see, an adult foster care home runs, and he wasn’t the only individual with access to the web. There’s just no direct way to nail that it was he who was guilty of the action. Beckerman claims that you just can’t hold someone liable for copyright infringement unless you are able to show they did it.

This looks not unreasonable. There’s no promise that the exact same standard will be used by judges across the country, however.

Hollywood undoubtedly won’t prevent making efforts to get cash from pirates who download their pictures and that’s good and hasn’t. They’ve a right to shield their property, but at the exact same time, Hollywood must additionally have more to go on than simply IP addresses as hard evidence of obtaining illegal content, particularly since it’s difficult to tell if it’s really you doing the downloading in the place where you have internet access.