Nearly every family can make itself relying on an electric car for transport and completely reliant on clean, sustainable energy using such simple measures as powering its house with solar panels. But matters can be complicated for a small business, particularly one as large as Google.

It also intends an added 150 megawatts from a solar plant in Chile and a wind farm in Sweden.

After all the deals are closed, Google will be using up more than 2 gigawatts of clean energy, and plans to use 3.6 gigawatts by 2025. It says it intends to have all its 14 data centers on four continents powered by renewable energy to make sure they work as demand increases for the firm’s internet search engine, its own video service YouTube, its e-mail host Gmail and its mapping function.

Moreover supplying services that are extremely popular, Google also has tremendous amounts of cash, which can go quite a distance toward supporting other businesses – including power utilities – change their emphasis on energy sourcing or even to grow.

In this scenario, Google’s obligation to purchase renewable energy from both new and old utilities has supported several of them to construct new facilities that supply alternative power. They contain Duke Energy of Charlotte, N.C.; France’s EDF; and the U.S. division of the British firm RES Group.

Up to now, Google says it’s spent about $2.5 billion in renewable energy to supply its businesses with its present diet of 1.2 gigawatts of clean power. Up to now the firm has not said it intends to spend on the added energy it intends to buy.

Actually, Google has been cautious about just when it revealed any of this new initiative.

Another Google executive, Michael Terrell, the manager of infrastructure and energy, stated that while his firm has a reputation as a leader in selecting renewable energy over fossil fuels, its eco-friendly strategy should not be viewed as the domain name of high tech firms alone.

“We are actually attempting to direct this transition to a cleaner energy market,” Terrell told The New York Times. It is not more or less data centers or technology firms.”